Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Friendship is a blessing for our human life because they can save us from danger as well as helps to construct our life more convincing way. The importance of friendship is undeniable in our everyday life. Keeping relation with old friends are more important than to making a new friend is the given statement- with this someone would agree, others would disagree. In my opinion, it is a paramount importance to keep the old friend alive in our life rather than making less time known friends. I think in this way for the following two important reason.
The main reason is that the probability of better understanding with old friends. In a friendship understanding is vital that acts as a chain reaction to keep the thread to put in correct order and also helps to maintain a balance relationship with both sides. For example, during my school life we had encountered a lot of friends. From them a little people is still on my list whom I have to know more than 15 years. A few years ago I was facing a tragic road accident and I was admitted to the nearby hospital. On that time, my school friend were came forward and beard my every medical expense. Moreover, still they are taking my update by making phone calls, sometime visiting my house. As you can see that for the sake of old friend I am now healthy and able to continue my life. For this reason, for me they are blessings.
Another reason is that old friendship is important because they helped to shape our life. The most sensitive part of our life is our childhood days when we are vulnerable to become immoral. On that time, they helped to shape me as a moral and upright person. For instance, on our school days I came to know one of my friend name Sohel. I was influenced by his honesty and a modern mind to unshackle the chain of prejudices from our society. Moreover, his different approach and activities helped to construct my mind. In addition, by learning those traits, later in my life I established a charitable organization and still working to change our society in a correct order. This experience with my friend was the great inspiration for me and urged me to value my friendship.
In conclusion, it is possible to describe a lot about the new friend but in reality they are not as genuine as our old friends. Earlier friends are beneficial not only for helping during our needs but also helps to shape our life in a right order. So, we should always appreciate of our old friend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | sonyeoso | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | Mitra-T | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | YAGUT | 75 | view |
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland They date from the late Neolithic period around 4 000 years ago They are round in shape they were carved from several types of stone most are about 70 mm in diame 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news resources Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People behave differently when they wear different clothes Do you agree that different clothes influence the way people behave Use specific examples to support your answer 73
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach. 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, well, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 66.0 43.0788530466 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55505617978 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60207447371 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476404494382 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8463823769 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.08 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.24 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196080536904 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665980060237 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076726002901 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146336773895 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078815149196 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.