The graph below shows how elderly people in the Europe spent their free time between 1980 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided line chart illustrates how senior citizens in Europe used their spare time in the previous 30 years from 10980 to 2010.
As can be seen from the line chart, there was a dramatical increase in the proportion of hiking throughout three decades. Additionally, despite of many fluctuations, at the end of time frame, almost the percentage of activities were higher than that at the beginning, except theatre activities.
It is clear that physical activities are favorite activities of the elder in Europe within three decades. Evidently, the proportion of hiking rose sharply from 20% to 80%. At the same time, the figure for playing sport activities always higher than the rest activities, account for more than 60%.
With regard to the non-physical activities, the year 1980s to 2010s saw the strongly growth in the percentage of reading and surfing the Internet activities. Both of them were more than a half in 2010s, whereas just made up 30% and under 10% in 1980s. On the other hand, theatre was the only non-physical activities in which elderly people spent less time for.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-07 | Andrew Chen | 78 | view |
- Nowadays many people can not write and read What problem does this case What measures can governments take to solve this issue 89
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the Europe spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Nowadays many people can not write and read What problem does this case What measures can governments take to solve this issue 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 193, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2010s'.
Suggestion: in the 2010s
...ies. Both of them were more than a half in 2010s, whereas just made up 30% and under 10%...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 242, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
... whereas just made up 30% and under 10% in 1980s. On the other hand, theatre was the onl...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72332436414 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631868131868 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4703863521 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.111111111 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0955355004395 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040794423826 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051163609451 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657158870126 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445760875555 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.