Varying views are on board regarding the impact of technology on the lives of employees. One faction of the society welcomed the changes brought by technology since modern technology has made the workers’ life comfortable and enjoyable. On the other hand, there are some people who argue against this contention. This essay, however, supports the former view and presents its arguments in the ensuing paragraphs.
First and foremost, it is an accredited fact that modern technology has bestowed a plethora of benefits upon workers. Primarily, telecommunication has enhanced the quality of life, as employees these days are leading a quite easy and relaxing life. For example, in the present scenario, employees can work from their home without any need to pay a visit at their office. Adding to this, this new change in work culture also resulted in an escalation of quality of work. Therefore, it is a win-win situation for both the employees and employers.
From a social point of view, the new work from home culture has let the employees to spend valuable time with their family members. To cite an example, the time saved from commuting between office and home would be devoted to family members. Furthermore, employees can also lend a helping hand to their counterparts in the household chores. Therefore, it is rational to state that new innovations have made the life of a working class quite amusing and comfortable.
However, the picture is not so rosy. Some people argue that this recent paradigm shift in work culture has more drawbacks than advantages. This view is born out of the fact that with the advent of computer and the Internet, employees are leading a more hectic and competitive life. Moreover, human is a social animal and social interaction with his peers is an integral part of his life. Unfortunately, this technology has dramatically dwindled the social interaction in other people. However, this is a short-sighted view.
After close scrutiny of the various aspects of the subject in question, it can be concluded that as every coin has two faces, similarly technology has both advantages and disadvantages to the workers. But, it can be safely stated that merits of advanced technological equipments used in industry easily outweigh its demerits to a great extent.
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valueable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and 78
- Many parents think that it is good to teach children about the value of money Why do you think it is important to teach them the value of money In what ways can you help children learn the value of the money 67
- Some children find some subjects as mathematics and philosophy are too difficult to learn so some people argue that those subjects should be optional rather than compulsory To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that new technology always improves the lives of workers Other people believe that it results in disadvantages for workers Discuss both the views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 7, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'scrutiny'.
Suggestion: scrutiny
...r, this is a short-sighted view. After close scrutiny of the various aspects of the subject i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, therefore, for example, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11140583554 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86258393579 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535809018568 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9813506746 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7619047619 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9523809524 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164291866385 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471814240055 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423397542536 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907939031721 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059856591633 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.