There is an argument whether country government should use huge amount of money on building railway lines for rapid trains or use them on upgrading current public transportation. I completely agree with the latter that it is best to spend the money to improve current public transportation.
On the one side, building railway lines for rapid trains is great because it will make more rapid trains to operate. Rapid trains are different from other trains as it will enable the passengers to cut the time needed to transport from one place to other places. Thus the greater the amount of rapid trains operate, the faster citizens to arrive at their destined places. Moreover, it can also minimize the traffic congestion that happens in country if citizens prefer to ride rapid trains than to ride other public transportation because it has special railway line which only rapid trains use.
On the other side, upgrading current public transportation is great because it will make them more convenient and will encourage citizens to use them. The more citizens use public transportation, the less traffic congestion will happen. Additionally, the fare of riding public transportation such as MRT and bus are affordable and cheap. Thus, the possibility of citizens to switch from their personal transportation is higher, which will make the chance for traffic congestion to be overcome is also higher.
In conclusion, both building railway lines and upgrading existing public transportation are good choice when a country government has huge amount of money as both of them will help reducing the traffic congestion problem. However, I completely agree with the latter option as it has higher chance in reducing traffic congestion problem because of its affordable fare, that will make public to more likely to switch from their personal transportation.
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 67
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both the views and give o 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ansport from one place to other places. Thus the greater the amount of rapid trains ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
...ount of money as both of them will help reducing the traffic congestion problem. However...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25925925926 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85495281779 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430976430976 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9275967346 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.166666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209598784378 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936602166305 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606825173753 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147137462467 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502271736717 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.