The image below shows the process of making carbonated drinks.
The diagram gives information about the process of generating carbonated drinks in factories.
From an overall perspective, this procedure has 5 various steps utilizing developed devices as well as several ingredients and the final product will be sent to supermarkets to be consumed by customers.
In the first stage, raw water has been conducted to a filter before not only chemicals, but also water softener have been added to it. Then, the clean water has been pumped to electronic heaters. Cooling pipe has been released, subsequently, to a tank where carbon dioxide will be joined into the process.
In the third stage, carbonated water has gone to a mixing tank where it is an appropriate time to add coloring, syrup and flavor to the drink. Before water is filled into bottles and cans during the following stage, another filter has required. Packaging is the final phase where all the products will be sent to shops by trucks across the cities.
- The chart below shows what anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 78
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station 73
- The process details designs of a modern landfill for household waste 61
- The plans show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 73
- The image below shows the process of making carbonated drinks 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, then, third, well, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99375 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67686120998 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63125 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5330162649 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109262165302 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571010369893 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821306109181 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880786903125 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885452708479 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.