Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?
They say that a person may become lost in tons of information. However, the different sources of information provide us with different points of view, including the views on the same object under the other angle, moreover the web share the additional blocks of data, which can help complete the whole picture and purely understand the topic. Hence, I firmly believe that internet plays an indispensable role by providing important reports.
Indeed, the view of others’ is a valuable thing, especially in the field of work with project under strict deadlines and in terms of time pressure, where global opinions and views under different angles matter. For example, the team working on a project obtains information from different sources such as meetings with other people, however nowadays we have a very strong and powerful tool to obtain information in a much smarter and fastest way. So, the data from the Internet may be used to acquire different views on the problem and provide the only viable solution. Only problem in here is that the Internet may accumulate information from unreliable sources, since we never know who is the author of the source.
By the same token, the valuable instructions obtained around the globe may act as a “final block” or “last detail of the puzzle”. To be specific, it is impossible for a person to know everything in the whole world. Since Internet is accessible to a wide range of users with completely different knowledge around the World, the complete data for each topic could be easily found on the web. Therefore, this depicts that in the modern era, internet lends us useful knowledge to get rid of the issues.
Furthermore, the misleading information may harm the researcher by making him to draw foolish conclusions, based on the lies. Detrimental effect from usage of wrong data could be uncountable. Mankind builds its future in twenty-first century, highly relying on the global data and web. Mostly, the sources from the Internet are available for changes from any unknown user, thus making it difficult to use data obtained from the global network. Wikipedia, one of the largest e-libraries, demonstrates the situation discussed above, in which a person writes a post or a story treating the facts in a wrong way, discouraging the general public from using the web.
In conclusion, the global web inculcates us meaningful data to get awareness about what is happening around us.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-03-14 | ngaliulin | 76 | view |
2022-11-15 | rpinisetti8 | 86 | view |
2022-09-17 | usef | 73 | view |
2022-08-19 | shiiwem | 60 | view |
2022-06-03 | Sudan Devkota | 76 | view |
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to so much information creates problems Which view do you agree with 85
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth century Dutch painters However there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style and inde 73
- Global Issues 3
- Sea otters 81
- communal encyclopaedias 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t is accessible to a wide range of users with completely different knowledge arou...
^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... World, the complete data for each topic could be easily found on the web. Theref...
^^
Line 4, column 593, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...es a post or a story treating the facts in a wrong way, discouraging the general public from u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 626, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... facts in a wrong way, discouraging the general public from using the web. In conclusion, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2043.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05693069307 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74783581327 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55198019802 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3236943239 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.176470588 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7647058824 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200864234031 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058097418587 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547787845007 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104104352793 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088106097248 0.0645574589148 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.