Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones. Is this a positive development or a negative one? - with errors
In most schools around the world, student have their own mobile phone. While this devices can undoubtedly play a role in safety, connectedness and even learning, many schools have chosen to restrict their use in campus. In my view, this is a positive step and can bring benefits not only academically but physically and socially too.
Restrict phone use in the classroom itself can improve learning. This is simply because, without these devices, there are far fewer distractions for teachers and students. When a student has their phone in their lap or pocket, for instance, there is irresistible urge check constantly for texts, alerts or social media updates. Even most observant teacher cannot prevent them from sneaky checking their messages or scrolling through this irelevant material during the lesson. These endless distractions draw attention away from important educational matters and erode attention spans, which can have long-term effects to academic progress. A blanket ban on phones during class frees learners from this compulsive checking and allows them to focus.
In addition, to banning phones in the classroom, a school that restricts their use outside class can also expect improvements in student wellbeing. Indeed, if phones are banned at lunchtime and recess, children are forced to engage in a more meaningful and prehaps activve way with their classmates. They may play games sports or simply sit and chat together, activities what are far healthier than sitting alone hunched over a screen.
Without limitaons enforced by the school children simply cannot draw the line on their phone use. These social and physical benefits is only possible with strict mobile rules.
In conclusion, despite phones are a part of our modern lives, I strongly feel that their use in schools should be limited. With firm boundaries and bans in some situations, students are able to learn better, strongthen friendships and engage in healthier pursuits.
- Men and women employed in full time jobs should share the responsibilities of household chores Do you agree or disagree Share relevant personal experiences 73
- You are going on holiday next week and you need to ask your friend to watch your dog while you are away Write a letter to your friend In your letter 1 state how long you will be away 2 tell them what needs to be done 3 state how you will compensate them 56
- You are working for a company You need to take some time off work and want to ask your manager about this Write a letter to your manager In your letter explain why you want to take time off work give details of the amount of time you need suggest how your 78
- Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your houseflat Write a letter to your neighbours In your letter explain the reasons for the noise apologise describe what action you will take 73
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Today more people are travelling than ever before Why is this the case What are the benefits of travelling for the traveller Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowle 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...dent have their own mobile phone. While this devices can undoubtedly play a role in ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 201, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... situations, students are able to learn better, strongthen friendships and engage in h...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35048231511 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63002066832 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623794212219 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9656437645 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273294727906 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932427950982 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069662311091 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159082939984 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070071566196 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.