The graph below shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total supply in 2000, 2004, 2007.
The bar chart display changes in the percentage of renewable energy supplied in Australia, Germany, Norway and Iceland in the period from 2000 to 2007.
Overall, it is clear that renewable energy is the most popular in Norway, while the opposite was true for Australia. Besides, despite some fluctuations, there was an upward trend in all four countries.
Standing at over 60 percent in 2000, the percentage of renewable energy provided in Norway increased markedly in the next 7 years, peaking at nearly 80 percent in 2007. In 2000, about 12 percent of total energy supply in Germany was renewable. The figure then continued to rise to nearly 15 percent in 2004 and reached its top at nearly 20 percent in 2007.
Comparing to other countries, the number of Australia was the lowest over the period. Its figure fluctuated over time, peaked at 10 percent in 2004. In contrast, renewable energy contained over 50 percent of total energy in Iceland in 2000, followed by an increase to almost 60 percent in 2004 then a decrease to 55 percent in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-19 | dinhtuan2201200104112000 | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people while others say that technology has the opposite effect Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total supply in 2000 2004 2007 78
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 5.05154639175 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 937.175257732 93% => OK
No of words: 180.0 206.0 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85555555556 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58069758011 2.54303337028 101% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 127.690721649 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 290.88556701 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.9471203709 44.8134815571 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1111111111 76.5299724578 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 16.8248392259 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 4.34317383033 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264662569374 0.216113520407 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119214115343 0.0766984524023 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938400445157 0.0603063233224 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174234251232 0.12726935374 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658945636096 0.0580467560999 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 8.37731958763 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 70.7449484536 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 7.45979381443 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 8.71597938144 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 7.59969072165 112% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 41.2886597938 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.