Money offered for postgraduate research is limited: As a consequence, some people argue that financial support from the government should only be provided for scientific research rather than research for less useful subjects. Do you agree or disagree
With limited public funding, many countries tend to give priorities to research for “hard sciences” rather than “soft science”. Research on both can benefit society as a whole in different ways. Therefore, I disagree with the given statement that government should fund only be for scientific research.
Government funding for postgraduate research is limited, so clearly, decisions need to be made concerning the research that receives priority. Our modern global system relies a lot more on science and technology. So, I think that this is where the majority of funding should go. Countries that are in the lead as far a scientific development is concerned are the ones most likely to be successful. If we rank countries by their level of scientific development and then by their economic success, the two lists will look similar. Scientific developments will most probably result in work opportunities, including chances for those without science backgrounds.
The role of science and technology in promoting the development of a country is widely acknowledged. One prominent example is that prevalent use of computer technology, which has significantly improved the efficiency of our work and changed our lifestyle. Technological achievements are attributed to the advancement of scientific theories and their applications. The government ought to provide financial support for the teaching of science, such as building new laboratories, purchasing advance equipment and awarding outstanding scientists. If the government gives priority to scientific subjects, it would encourage more students to devote themselves to science, which would benefit the country and the world as a whole.
However, I do not think that all of the government money should go towards scientific research at the postgraduate level. Science is important, but it is not everything. Other subjects, for example, art, also deserve attention and support of the public and government. Philosophy and literature prompt students to reflect on the significance of life and develop a positive attitude towards the world. History and geography help to broaden the horizon of students and make them wise and open-minded. Therefore, we should not ignore the status of other subjects in our education system.
To recapitulate, the government consider and fund not only the area of science but also should include non-scientific research too.
- Studies show that many criminals have a low level of education For this reason people believe that the best way to reduce crime is to educate people in prison so they can get a job when they leave prison Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people use the Internet to search for solutions to their medical problems Is it a positive or negative development 67
- You have planned to study in Australia You have sent a letter to a college but you have not received a reply from the college Write a letter to the college principal In your letter you should give details of the course that you wished to do say why do you 78
- A large amount of advertisements nowadays are now targetted on children Many people say this has negative effects on children and should therefore be banned To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- individual greed and selfishness has been the basis of the modern society Some people think that we must return to the older and more traditional values of respect for the family and the local community in order to create a better world to live in To what 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 30, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... a whole. However, I do not think that all of the government money should go towards scie...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, then, therefore, for example, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2053.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56368563686 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16731105877 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7977636313 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7619047619 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.80952380952 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334259145004 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089672799356 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100469605609 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195172358907 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825169279288 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.