Buzzing is becoming controversial topic
In this set of materials, the writer strongly postulates that because of the deceptive techniques which buzzers used to lure the consumers, it should be banned. As they don't give cues to the consumers that they are hired for their jobs. He further provides three reasons to endorse its idea. On the other hand, the professor states
that it is a completely misleading perspective about buzzers and gainsays each of the arguments mentioned in the reading.
First and foremost, the passage begins by asserting that it's people's right that they know the intention of buzzers is only to gain profit, after selling their products. As they could provide incorrect information about their product just for running their own business. Nonetheless, the lecture maintains that though people are being paid, they actually acknowledge the worth of the product they are selling. Moreover, their intention is not to misguide the public as their image of the product is based on reality. For instance, if they are praising something it is because they really like that, and personally experiment with the product. Therefore they are not making people perplexed, only for their own benefits.
Next, the professor in the lecture further points on that people asks many questions about which they are concerned, and if they do not get satisfactory responses they simply leave the products and do not buy them. Subsequently, people clarify their all suspicions about the endorsements by asking general questions i.e quality, price, and durability. These claims refute the writer’s implication that buzzers do not have to answer the queries of buyers because they are not attentively listening to their acclamations. On the contrary, when buyers know that person selling the product is paid, they become doubtful and more cautious of the claims, made by buzzers.
Ultimately, the article wraps his arguments by declaring that misguiding traps of the buzzers have catastrophic effects on social relationships as they break people's trust by hiding their inner intentions so people become suspicious of developing relationships. The speaker in the listening rebuts this point by insisting that if the product selling agents deal harshly with people the company does not recruit that agent again. because their experiences with people are flourishing, they gain people's trust and are open to the public about their dealings, therefore it has a positive influence on society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...consumers, it should be banned. As they dont give cues to the consumers that they ar...
^^^^
Line 3, column 642, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...personally experiment with the product. Therefore they are not making people perplexed, o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 430, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...pany does not recruit that agent again. because their experiences with people are flour...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, moreover, nonetheless, really, so, therefore, for instance, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 22.412803532 241% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 1373.03311258 151% => OK
No of words: 390.0 270.72406181 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30769230769 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73068616703 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 145.348785872 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525641025641 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 419.366225166 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4421282709 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.764705882 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0178557547009 0.272083759551 7% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00696639600581 0.0996497079465 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0193512296453 0.0662205650399 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0105685781893 0.162205337803 7% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012954160428 0.0443174109184 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 63.6247240618 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.