The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
What is the main advantage of reading history and how people can take advantages of history? Some people claim that we can find out that people are living now are completely different life from our decendents. However, I think reading history could have more advantages as just find out differences. Thsu, I strongly disagree with the proposed claim.
First of all, the most benefit of reading history, I think, is understanding the political issue of bygone kingdom. By reading history scrutinizelly, people could find the main rreasons of thrive or fiasco of a country or kingdom. For example, historian could precicely describe the reasons that empire Iran defeated by Arabs in the appearance of Islam and explain why iranian with arranged army could not millitate rudimentary Arab's army. By understanding such information, people could achieve valueable insight that could be useful for modern political descision.
Moreover, apart from political issue, cultural and social concerns could be considered. Historian could present valueable information about culture of our decendent and accordingly, we find out the reason of recent traditions. Therefore, we can conclude that these traditions have benefits for modern life or it is just for special condition in the past and it is not reasonable for modern life. For instance, Iranian had some traditions that force the groom to pay money to girl's father for wedding with a girl. It seems the main reason of this custom was to find out that sons were determind for marriage. However, by finding out themain reason of this custom, people may decide to remove this tradition from their modern life.
On the other hand, some people believe, the aforementioned benefit could achieve without understanding history. For example, modern political science provide wide insight about governing a country and reading histoy is not necessary. Likewise for cultural and social issue. For instance by evaluating benefits of common traditions by experts, they can provide efficient information about advantages and disadvantages of each traditions for people. Although the reasons that opposers maintain looks cogent at first glance, the principal of these knowledge that they have mentioned is history, at least partly even not completely. So, They reasons could not be persuasive.
In conclusion, I believe, the benefits of reading history is much more than just dispelling the illusion of difference between modern people and their decendents. For example, we can name political, cultural and social issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | raghavchauhan619 | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | AmieeZhao | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | maryle | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 54
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 61, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...st benefit of reading history, I think, is understanding the political issue of bygone kingdom. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 639, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arriage. However, by finding out themain reason of this custom, people may decide...
^^
Line 4, column 234, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...ry and reading histoy is not necessary. Likewise for cultural and social issue. For inst...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 539, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'these knowledges'?
Suggestion: this knowledge; these knowledges
...ogent at first glance, the principal of these knowledge that they have mentioned is history, at...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 638, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'reason'
Suggestion: reason
...st partly even not completely. So, They reasons could not be persuasive. In conclusion...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, however, if, likewise, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, apart from, as to, at least, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2155.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40100250627 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79190345598 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498746867168 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0143900211 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9545454545 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1363636364 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 5.21951772744 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132651156515 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471544140441 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577198978789 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969402311816 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062558323415 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.