Some people argue that there is too little home’s waste is recycled. There could be several reasons for that and I agree with them that legal requirement is necessary to increase it but I still believe that it is not the only and most effective way.
There are various reasons why people believe that recycled waste from home nowadays is not enough. Firstly, there are millions of people throughout the world do not understand about the importance of recycling or even the concept about it. For instance, most old people in my country, Viet Nam, think that plastic or other waste are identical. Secondly, laws and rules about recycling are still not effective enough. Therefore, in developing countries, because of the busyness of working time, most people fell that it is uncomfortable or wasting their time to classify their garbage. Additionally, in these countries, governments tend to be not pay enough attention for recycling jobs.
However, many ways could also enhance the responsibility to recycle. Laws or legal requirements could play a significant role in the increase of the weight of waste recycled. For instance, in some modern countries, the percentage of plastic trash recycled in some recent years was rose sharply thanks to new laws about the legal requirement. Additionally, there are some other ways could be more effective than laws, such as education or organizations. Through education or organizations, people could have more awareness and experience about recycling easily. For example, in Singapore’s education, there are several lessons in children’s school about the way to classify kinds of trash and how it makes the environment become better.
In conclusion, I believe that waste from homes is not enough and legal requirement could be effective as well as other ways like increase the people’s knowledge about recycle.
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- A government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Task 1 The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25838926174 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88191740909 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503355704698 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9636501503 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.466666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435846458569 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146873511112 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647859067673 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266140241348 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553729604492 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.