With the Lightning speed of technological evolution, it becomes easy to access a variety of news for the whole world by sitting at home. News channels broadcast different news from a variety of their resources. In this regard, many people like to watch and listen to news from similar sources to their own ideas, while others think that it is crucial to watch and listen to news channels that present different thought processes. From my perspective, the latter view carries more weight. I take the position on account for the following reasons.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that giving an opportunity to watch different news channels might help people to uncovered real truth and facts. It is a normal human tendency that people usually like to hear or listen from others who also think similarly. Needless to say, having single-sided knowledge only makes people biased and rational. However, hearing or reading different perspectives provoke our minds to search for the accuracy of our original beliefs. Ultimately, people will build their opinions depending upon the logical facts. To elaborate this more, when I got my first chance to vote at the age of 18, I was sure about whom I was going to vote for, and my decision was very much influenced by my friends at one time. But my father suggested me to follow various debates on news channels so that I could know more about upcoming the presidential election. Consequently, going through different discussions about the presidential election from many political spoke people has helped me to realize my mistake. Had I not seen those arguments from people who used to carry a distinctive stance, I would have voted for the wrong person for my country.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind that listening and hearing diverse news would enhance people’s tolerance. Sometimes, not having a comprehensive knowledge lead to developing misconceptions in people’s mind, and it is more likely that they would carry that false views for a whole life. On the contrary, watching through different news channels can improve their critical thinking and cognitive ability. Additionally, it helps them to be patient while watching two opponents are arguing with each other. Take my own father’s experience as an example. My father keeps himself very calm and polite whenever he faces conflicts with his friends or colleagues. After watching news channels for many years, he started believing that people do not need to show a strong approach in arguments before discovering a real truth.
All in all, contemplating all remarks, I strongly believe that watching and listening to news will help people to be more flexible and tolerant. Also, it helps them to eliminate biased and prejudiced misconceptions from their mind.
- tpo 66 Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage 70
- TPO 48 In recent years many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live for e 80
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 90
- A D It is better to take risks and explore new things when you are older than when you are young 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Improving schools is the most important factor in the successful development of a country Use specific reasons to support your answer 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, similarly, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2351.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1220043573 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7559232556 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544662309368 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8176320347 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.217391304 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9565217391 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5652173913 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260861039737 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746005795606 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553385800491 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173870960269 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753965911799 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.