Archeological artifacts restoration
In this set of materials, the writer strongly postulates that the department of Archaeology has faced many troubles and complications in Britain during discovery and research on old cultural artifacts which are of great value. On the other hand, the professor explains that in 1990, new rules and regulations have been introduced that brought changes in the field of Archaeology. Also ameliorated the three conditions provided by the author in the passage.
First and foremost, the passage begins by asserting that from 1950, there were many building projects going on to accommodate the increasing population of Britain. So many valuable remains of great interest were lost during digging the base of the new structure. Instead of protecting ancient assets from damage, they continued with the construction.
In contrast, the speaker states that before construction, the site has to be thoroughly checked in order to find any precious art pieces. If found any, the investors and government officials along with archaeologists should devise a plan to preserve priceless items. They should do it by constructing on either side or completely eliminating the building. Or moreover, record and save it before proceeding further.
In fact, the professor further states that the cost of preserving artifacts would be paid by the investors. Also, the expenses of study at the construction site would be paid by constructors. These claims refute the author's implication of insufficient money for archaeological research. The government was paying charges for expenses of the investigation in the twentieth century but, that left other plans incomplete. In addition, the government has declined the funding now.
Ultimately, the article wraps its argument by stating that the people who chose archaeology as a profession had trouble finding jobs. And they did not get paid for the study. However, the professor denies this point by declaring that professional archaeologists were hired. They got rewarded for the experimentation and then analyzing records. They also get paid for writing research papers. Furthermore, it states the demand for expert Archaeologists was great.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-24 | saamaan | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 3 | view |
| 2021-03-13 | Winner_007 | 3 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | Safa Arshad | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-05 | attia | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree It is better to use your own knowledge and experience to solve problems than to ask other people for advice 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 77
- Cloud seeding 80
- MEthods to predict earthquakes 81
- Extinction of dinosaurs 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ht changes in the field of Archaeology. Also ameliorated the three conditions provid...
^^^^
Line 6, column 217, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...y constructors. These claims refute the authors implication of insufficient money for a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, as to, in addition, in contrast, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1373.03311258 134% => OK
No of words: 335.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49850746269 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08637950872 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 145.348785872 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5463628135 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7142857143 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9523809524 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0315844290499 0.272083759551 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00798148752209 0.0996497079465 8% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0250238523858 0.0662205650399 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0178511173783 0.162205337803 11% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021998471584 0.0443174109184 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 63.6247240618 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.