Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories mentioned in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture offer two opposing views on the proposed solutions to the golden frogs' fungus disease. Whereas the author of the reading suggests that with these solutions, the golden frog population will be survived, the lecturer states that none of the mentioned solutions are efficacious to assist the frogs. She casts doubt on the main points made in the text by providing the three reasons.
First, according to the text, a kind of bacteria could protect the golden frogs by producing a chemical which abolishes the fungal cells. However, the lecturer disputes that the bacterium solution is not permanent, and if the bacteria does not have the chance of staying on the golden frogs' skin, it won't produce the chemical for protecting frog.
Secondly, the author asserts that by releasing the newly- bred golden frogs from captivity, they could increase their population through the wild. Even though, the lecturer believes that releasing them into the wild with the same condition is dangerous for the golden frogs' population because they will be in cthe environment consist of many animals with diseases which cause them to have the frugus problem again. She says the newly replenished frogs will soon die out as well.
Finally, the frogs could increase their body temperatures and defend themselves, based on what the reading claims. Althogh, the lecturer implies that this feature have a drawback fr the frogs, which is the energy consuming. She explains that frogs will loos so much energy to heat their bodies which endanger themselves and weaken them, so they become suseptible to get more diseases.
To recap, the lecturer argues that the three proposed solutions in the reading will not be effective to survive the golden frogs. She dicusses the reasons as mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-07 | amyabt | 70 | view |
| 2020-10-07 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 60 | view |
| 2020-10-07 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Collectors prize the ancient life size clay statues of human figures made on Kali Island but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision Since archaeologists have recently discovered molds of human head 58
- TOEFL T P O 14 integrated writing task 70
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities Recently we signed a contract with the Fly Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our fast food w 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...on the proposed solutions to the golden frogs fungus disease. Whereas the author of t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...e condition is dangerous for the golden frogs population because they will be in cthe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 295.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10847457627 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43842645679 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545762711864 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8690879529 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.923076923 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159126524755 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634222560016 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518074168864 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995285168912 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688067095318 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.