Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to work as a team than as an individual to succeed.
My answer Team work is always said to be more efficient and effective. But in my opinion, working individual helps more as compared group working. I completely disagree with the stand that working in group is better to succeed insted of invudial working. I fell this way for couple of reasons, which I will explore in the following paraghaph. First of credits are always distributed in a team, all members in the team will work or not does not matter. So the actual hard working members dont get equal benifites. My personal experience is great example for this. Five years ago when I was in 9th grade class, we had a group project. Our group had six students, we planned our topic and distributed the responsibilities fo completinf the project. But only four of the members were working very hard on the project, rest fo the two were giving excueses. And at the end we four had to work on the full project. During the exam professor was very happy with our project and he gave the same score to everybody in the, which was very disspointing for us. As a result I think that working invudial will give you the full credits of you project and you will be satisfied with it. Next, the leaders in a team cause problems to some indudials who are really talented in the group. This can cause failure of the work and full team will be responsible. Draiwing from my own experience two years ago when I working as inten in a company. Gropu of new candidates were made, and were told to work on an assignment. We started working on it, and during the discussion their were dividing opinions in our gropu. So majority fo students were in one side so they starting listening the one who state the point. And was so called leader of the project. I had some solutions regarding the problems, but the leader didnt consider my solutions and tried a differnt approach. And others also supported him in his dession. As a result his plain failed and our manager scolded us and told to resolve it. The manager told the same solution which I topd previously. In fact, I was also blambed for the mistakes done by our group. To conclude I strongly belive that working individual is always a better option. This is because you will all the credits of your work and you dont have to be disspointed for others mistakes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-08 | bhaskar1325 | 60 | view |
| 2021-07-11 | arius | 90 | view |
| 2021-07-11 | arius | 76 | view |
| 2021-04-19 | Mithun Chandra Banik | 85 | view |
| 2021-04-16 | SaC | 70 | view |
- Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems 80
- Reading of Literature books 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 83
- Nutria 75
- These days if you pick up a newspaper or turn on the TV or radio you may hear or read about the advantages of driverless cars also called self driving or autonomous cars The technology is simple to understand using sensors and computers these cars can dri 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... opinion, working individual helps more as compared group working. I completely di...
^^
Line 1, column 488, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ter. So the actual hard working members dont get equal benifites. My personal experi...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1010, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
... he gave the same score to everybody in the, which was very disspointing for us. As ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1394, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...om my own experience two years ago when I working as inten in a company. Gropu of...
^
Line 1, column 1795, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... regarding the problems, but the leader didnt consider my solutions and tried a diffe...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 2247, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ll all the credits of your work and you dont have to be disspointed for others mista...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, regarding, so, i think, in fact, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51682692308 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52196228714 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483173076923 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3406422205 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.5925925926 100.406767564 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4074074074 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2962962963 5.45110844103 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207040233447 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560414262784 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637327161271 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207040233447 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 11.7677419355 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.64 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.