Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage.
First of all, avocados have vital nutrients that help in lowering blood pressure. They contain as many as 20 kinds of vitamins and minerals. To be specific, avocados are rich in phytonutrients and folic acid. These nutrients are known to be beneficial especially in lowering blood pressure. Secondly, avocados are good for a healthy pregnancy. As mentioned above, they are known to be rich in folic acid. Folic acid does not just lower blood pressure but also reduces the risk of miscarriage and neural tube defects during pregnancy. Lastly, eating avocados can also save a lot of money. Some vegetarians tend to eat avocados because they taste similar to meat products and seafood. In this sense, people can save money by eating the meat-flavored fruit since meat is more expensive than vegetables in general.
The reading and the lecture discuss on Avocados. While the reading says that their are manay advantages of eating avacados, the lecturer disagrees with the pionts mentioned.
Firstly the reading claims that avocados has vital nutriens , vataimins and minerals, which helps peoples in reducing blood pressure. However, the professor insists that avcoados contains lots of fats in it. It has 29gm of fats which is aproximately 300 calories. Ans fats cause weight gain and the over weight can cause increase blood pressure.
Next, the author asserts that the folic acid in avocados help women during pregancy by lowering the risk of nural tubes defects and miscarriage. In contrast, the lecture agues that avocados has worse effect on womens in pregancy and breast feeding womens. It reduces the amount of breast milk and also can breast cancer. Babys stomach are sensitive and cant digest that milk, so can cause a problem.
Finally, the passage states that avocados have the same tase of meat and seafood and it also costs less so peoples can save their money. On the other hand, the techear points out that farming of avocado require gallons of water and they are not cheap. Instead meat and seafood dosent require water which can also save our natural resources. And meat has comparatively low cost.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-07 | Shubham.garde | 76 | view |
- Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems 80
- Reading of Literature books 60
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage First of all avocados have vital nutrients that help in lowering blood pressure They contain as many as 20 kinds of vitamins and min 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society 80
- Nutria 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...n Avocados. While the reading says that their are manay advantages of eating avacados...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... claims that avocados has vital nutriens , vataimins and minerals, which helps peo...
^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...cancer. Babys stomach are sensitive and cant digest that milk, so can cause a proble...
^^^^
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...allons of water and they are not cheap. Instead meat and seafood dosent require water w...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03240740741 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30599925588 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601851851852 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.880944015 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6428571429 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4285714286 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152752700541 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474743192698 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494589667047 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0801555927954 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015245487318 0.0443174109184 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.