Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person. Why do you think this is the case ? What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?
Thanks to the advancement of technology, people can communicate with each other from distance via online platforms. This method has been favorably used nowadays by teenagers, which is understandable due to some certain reasons. To motivate young people to have more face-to-face meetings, schools and parents can take some actions proposed in this essay.
The convenience and fun created by online social networks has tremendously attracted youngsters. Firstly, chatting online can help teenagers, whose allowance may be limited, save time and money. More specifically, they would not need to travel a long journey to meet up with their peers or squander their pocket money on a drink outside. Secondly, numerous interesting applications on social platforms seem to let teenagers express themselves better. For example, emojis or GIFs are the two popular functions of messenger, an online chatting app, that allow users to use specific icons or images to demonstrate their feelings accordingly. These usages can be of great importance for children at puberty stage as they may normally find it difficult to show their emotions in front of others.
However, it is vital for teenagers to have real communicative skills with face-to-face meetings, and schools as well as families can encourage their children to do this by some methods. Teachers can make space for more teamwork during class and after school so as to bring the students together. For instance, a project where pupils have to assemble a model or draw a map, and then give a presentation about it would definitely require the cooperation of learners in real meetings. Parents may also play an important role in supporting their offspring to participate in sport activities so that they would interact with their peers during play time without having their eyes glued to the screen.
In conclusion, teenagers are appealed to online socializing due to the convenient functions of the online platforms. Nevertheless, there are ways that adults can encourage youngsters to meet each other in real life.
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... teamwork during class and after school so as to bring the students together. For instan...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31097560976 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9077822819 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606707317073 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4418660504 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.133333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113511696754 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413507468306 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285333742967 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785793524763 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345339675747 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.