In some countries nowadays people prefer variety of foods. Which are not grown in their local area. So these foods are imported from other regions. Do you think the advantages outweight the disadvantage?
There is a fact that the extent of high creativity of delicacy encourages people to consume, even though they should acquire all of them from the overseas. I determine that the disadvantages will be more seen and stronger over the advantage.
First of all, adverting various cuisines through social media is viral, therefore mankind desire to fulfil their taste or may be just following the trend. Numerous cuisines are being produced in foreign states but are still available to ship outside those countries. In this situation, making greater payment regarding import standard will not be issues for some people. They might claim that refreshments will be attaining happiness as the advantage behind this huge transaction.
On the contrary, buying unique meals can turn that habit to binge eating and excessive import. Consumer will enjoy and also habituate their taste like internationals instead of their traditional flavour. Furthermore, excessive import will be impacting to local industry development in their region along the lack of production simultaneously. Plethora of subordinates would be fired and being unemployed in which case of local business weaken. Instead, the higher order consumption of population, the greater employees would be needed and also wider local business to grow and rich. Besides focusing to the local employee, excessive import also forces customers to pay exorbitant taxes. Unfortunately, numerous people still do not comprehend this purchase activity only profiting other country.
To conclude, difference notions of basic needs like food improve individual food buying tendency which is the detrimental outweigh it beneficial. These detrimental are influenced through any expenditures that has been decided by the countries who produced it.
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- using telephone calls 11
- LIVING IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE COUNTRY 56
- Development plan for Islip Town Centre 78
- countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.do you think this is a positive or negative development? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, still, therefore, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61481481481 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88517329908 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677777777778 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.6113139094 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.066666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183104112445 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535548033823 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334822823336 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958863984038 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424611315386 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.