The bar chart compares the UK and France in terms of spending on five different categories (namely cars, computers, books, perfume and camera) over the year 2010.
Overall, in the UK, people spent more money on most goods, except for computers and perfume. Specially, expenditure on cars was highest in both nations.
The amount of money spent on cars in the UK was over 450,000 pounds, which was about 50,000 higher than that of France. Following this was books which was spent slightly lower ,at over 400,000 pounds, while the figure for France was much lower, just 300,000 pounds. Both countries spent nearly the same amounts of money on computers, at over 350,000 pounds in 2010.
Turning to the remaining categories, it can be seen that perfume was spent least quantity of money by the French and the British, at exactly 200,000 and almost 150,000 pounds respectively. By contrast, there was a big difference in the spending of two countries on camera, around over 350,000 pounds was used to consumer camera in the UK, which was over double that of France.
- the graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children
- the chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 78
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- the graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...was books which was spent slightly lower ,at over 400,000 pounds, while the figure...
^^
Line 4, column 70, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'spent the least'.
Suggestion: spent the least
...gories, it can be seen that perfume was spent least quantity of money by the French and th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erfume was spent least quantity of money by the French and the British, at exactl...
^^
Line 4, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., around over 350,000 pounds was used to consumer camera in the UK, which was ov...
^^
Line 4, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to consumer camera in the UK, which was over double that of France.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88397790055 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36731144699 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569060773481 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2097274364 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0810976298878 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437678039288 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446850264347 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0559149417086 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208204398244 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.