Efficacy quotient plays a key role in determining the success of an enterprise. If the process failed to produce the ultimate product, then the enterprise is at much loss on its investments. As it is well known that time and tide wait for none, investing on manpower and time for a failure final product is not considered a viable way to succeed. Moreover, an enterprise functions on a profit based approach. It is not a research laboratory to function with a trial and error basis.
Firstly, a business that needs a lot of research must have a separate portfolio to articulate the plan in it's production. They cannot risk their profits towards an unsuccessful product. Upon deciding the proper planning, coordinating, implementing teams with efficient methods, the product must surely be a fruitful utility for the enterprise. For example, whenever a software company is about to launch an app or a software, they have a clear discretion in teams such as a development , testing, production and support and hardware team. A clear coordination between these teams ensure the successful launch of their software products.
Secondly, there must be a vivid deadline for the product to go live so that any researches or analysis within the timeframe can be compromised for testing further. For instance, projects based on construction of oil rigs to extract oil always has a clear deadline of more than a year, giving ample time for the employees to expedite and investigate on the site. A deadline that is met on time is tantamounted to the satisfaction of the clients. Furthermore to add, a business that does not meet client's satisfaction is supposed to be at the verge of losing its future projects. Consequently, the enterprise will surely lose it's reputation.
To conclude, I strongly disagree with the mere observations made in making a product as it is an incompetent way of doing business leading to non productivity.
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 20 for test purposes use and refer to the current year
- The chart below gives attendance figures for Grandville Stadium from 2017 which are projected through 2030 after a major improvement project 67
- Some people say that saving money is good way and other say that spending money is the best way to enjoy life Discuss both views and your opinion 84
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e mail correspondence Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity as well as protect the company from lawsuits Write a response in which you discu 83
- governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 487, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...iscretion in teams such as a development , testing, production and support and har...
^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ted to the satisfaction of the clients. Furthermore to add, a business that does not meet c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 320.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.015625 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08644299725 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571875 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8748297 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.3125 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126169894133 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398960840673 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404802227833 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880678541434 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413132508821 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.