The graph above shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of year in a European country between 1979 and 2004
The line graph depicts information about changes in the amount of fish and certain kinds of meat namely chicken beef or lamb consumed in a particular country for Europe from 1979 to 2004 the data is given by grams per person or Week
Overall, it can be manifested that the amount of fish and meat consumption fluctuated significantly during the period given white there is a dramatic fall in fish, lamb, been consumed chicken consumption saw an upward trend in the last year of the period
First of all, in 1979 the amount of fish consumed was very low, starting at just approximately 60 compared to the three others the figures for fish leveled off and experience a slight decrease at the end of the period beef consumption was the highest in 1979 which is around 220 this is followed by a drastic fluctuation between 1979 and 1989. Beef consumption then saw a sharp downfall and hit a trough at around 1100 at the end of the given period.
Second of all, chicken and lamb consumption was nearly the same in the starting year of the period about 150 in 1979. The amount of lamb consumed then dramatically dropped to just over 50 in 2004. reached its peak in 2001.
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how i will look after redevelopment next year 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 67
- The diagram shows the process of making instant coffee 71
- The graph above shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of year in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2018 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'compared' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'compares'.
Suggestion: compares
... low, starting at just approximately 60 compared to the three others the figures for fis...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Reached
...ically dropped to just over 50 in 2004. reached its peak in 2001.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5619047619 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52630604287 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538095238095 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 22.4926829268 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 302.280267302 43.030603864 702% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 191.6 112.824112599 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.0 22.9334400587 183% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224677002228 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885473547938 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867526973165 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137144839484 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255059248348 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.2329268293 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.23 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.06 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 11.4329268293 481% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.9970731707 171% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.