air pollution
Both the reading and the lecture discuss removing air pollution from the air. The reading states that different types of air purifiers and explain their benefits. However, the lecturer refutes that none of the methods is effective and reading passage is missing more information.
First of all, the reading passage states that HEPA filters are effective in removing dust and other particles, and they can absorb larger particles as well. This is because the filters are large enough and eco-friendly way. On the other side, the lecturer contrasts this idea by pointing out that smaller dust particles will affect our body and they are small enough to escape as well. Furthermore, he also says that it will cause allergens and pollens. Dust particles will be allowed in the air. The lecture is pointing a hole in author passage that they are very less effective.
Second, the reading passage mentions that Ozone-generating air purifiers will remove such harmful chemicals like an airborne and bad smell. As, provide a better environment and cleaner air. Yet, the lecturer challenges this argument by saying that it's a very dangerous and high concern for our health like create future problems like skin rashes, eyes, and lungs. He also states that it has the same effect as gasoline, the only advantage is its smell very pretty.
Finally, the reading argues that UV air purifiers will help to remove harmful bacteria especially the microscopic one. Since. the outcome will be better for the environment to live and provides clean air to the atmosphere. On the other hand, the lecturer rebuts this by explaining that it cannot purify the smells of cigarettes and smoke and cannot provide clean air. So here also the lecturer point of view is less effective against the lecturer.
Thus, there is a stark difference between the reading and the lecturer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-30 | Sachin1611 | 71 | view |
| 2020-12-19 | arun-kum6 | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-05 | parthiv007 | 66 | view |
| 2020-11-09 | Md. Mahafuzur Rahaman | 76 | view |
| 2020-10-30 | 29roysoma | 80 | view |
- air pollution 71
- TPO 50 Integrated Writing Task Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than 70
- nutria 83
- Amtrak is an intercity train service currently owned by the United States government There are a number of critics who believe that the government should not own Amtrak and that Amtrak should be sold to a privately owned company These critics put forward 80
- One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp fishing boats When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe and they die Some people suggest that this p 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...challenges this argument by saying that its a very dangerous and high concern for o...
^^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...acteria especially the microscopic one. Since. the outcome will be better for the env...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... especially the microscopic one. Since. the outcome will be better for the environm...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, thus, well, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0651465798 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52282601141 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517915309446 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5720825929 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3888888889 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0555555556 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220309273593 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805203218554 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124933581364 0.0662205650399 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123539737095 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11398574759 0.0443174109184 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.