Some people think that school children should learn to grow food as well as cook along with their lessons. What is your opinion about it ?
According to the statement, some of the masses believe that, along with the lessons, students should learn how to grow food and also to how to cook it. According to my opinion, they should do it and reasons behind this are explained in the paragraphs below.
To begin with, it is too valuable for school children to learn about the cultivation of food and also about the process of cooking food. Because there are plenty of benefits for them. First of all, if they learn about the methods of cultivation of food, then they become healthy and their immune system become strong and disease resistant, because this action include outdoor activities in which they work in green fields and inhale fresh air from plants. due to this, they also learn about the importance and essential requirements of green vegetables and pulses, so on for their health. Moreover, this activity also attach them with their tradition and culture. Because, if they do this then they learn about the process of cultivation in deep and get knowledge about the traditions methods which were done in ancient decades.
In addition, if students learn about cooking of food, then this also leads to numerous benefits for them. First and foremost benefit of this activity is that, this makes them independent. Because, in contemporary settings, mostly students go abroad, away from their parents for study or work and live there alone. Due to this, they become independent and make their food with their own hands without any difficulties. Therefore, they become able to know about the nutritious value of food. They set up their daily routine of meals according to their choices and cook the food according to their own taste.
To conclude, in my outlook, to learn grow food as well as to cook it is too valuable and beneficial for school children because, by this activities, they take great aspects which will become too helpful in their lives.
- Most people these days prefer getting news online to reading newspapers or watching TV Do you think it is a positive development 67
- More and more businesses as well as individuals are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather being face to face Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating 73
- The increase in people life expectancy means that they have to work older to pay for their retirement One alternative is that people start work at younger age Is this alternative positive or negative statement 56
- Today more and more full time university students focus on other activities rather than spend a lot of time studying Some people think it is essential for university students to be involved in other activities 73
- Fast food is becoming one part of life everywhere this has bad effects on our lifestyle and diet To what extent do you agree or disagree 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
According to the statement, some of the masses believe that, along with the les...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 457, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
...ields and inhale fresh air from plants. due to this, they also learn about the impo...
^^^
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to grow'
Suggestion: to grow
... To conclude, in my outlook, to learn grow food as well as to cook it is too valua...
^^^^
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...eficial for school children because, by this activities, they take great aspects whi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, as to, in addition, as well as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90769230769 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43787860055 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476923076923 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2006721984 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294259020006 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11298028093 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852941984146 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203421282407 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221196955542 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.