Children should choose their jobs similar to their parents or different explain your answers with reasosn
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that people adopt different ways for their living. In this regard, choosing a career is of paramount importance. There has been no shortage of debate amongst scholars on whether people should choose a job entirely different from their parents, or they contemplate following up on their parents' steps. As for the writer's opinion, I subscribe to the latter idea. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first reason coming to my mind to elucidate my point of view is associated with the idea that if children choose a profession similar to their parents, they will have complete guidance and support from their guardians. To be more specific, parents can support them and direct them to the path of their success. Vividly, it will enhance their knowledge as parents are experts in their field and children can get benefit from their knowledge by improving and learning from them. My experience with this is influenced by my compelling example. Five years ago, when I selected pharmacy as a career for me, I choose that profession because of my father who works as a pharmacist. Whenever I have any difficulty with my studies, my father is there to help me. On the other hand, my colleagues have to hire private tutors for their studies. Had not my father in the same profession, I would have been gotten immense assistance in my studies.
The second rationale for my opinion is rooted in the fact thAt when children adopt a job similar to their parents, it will provide them with the opportunity to get a better position and a good salary in their job. It is crystal clear that parent has strengthened their working relationship at their job, children can take advantage of those interpersonal relationships to succeed. It is axiomatic that parents can do anything for the better future of their child, and it is nothing if they have to ask their superior for their child's promotion. For instance, when I started doing the job as a pharmacist my father used his relations with his supervisor to get me the job. I was hired by his company and even got a raise in salary after six months of my job because of my efficient working skills. It's clear to see how my father, being in the same job, has provided me with a successful job and even promotion.
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that when parents and children are in the same job it is extremely beneficial. For the sake of brevity, a couple of points are worth reiterating, first children get to learn from them, second, they can utilize their experience to reach success. As for this writer's advice, I vehemently urge people to have the same job as their parents for their betterment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...g up on their parents steps. As for the writers opinion, I subscribe to the latter idea...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 305, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...xperience to reach success. As for this writers advice, I vehemently urge people to hav...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, as for, for instance, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 80.0 43.0788530466 186% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2276.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 481.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73180873181 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6731552938 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474012474012 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8580809687 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.454545455 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8636363636 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355008296323 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116622189548 0.076458572812 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904589168984 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244650263372 0.150856017488 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323586197212 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.