Nowadays in certain countries people are impacting with many heath issues due to extreme consumption of fast food. Some people argue that the government should bring this in control and increase the tax on such food item. However, I can not completely agree with this statement as I think is not a good way to solve this problem.
On the one hand, eating too much junk food leads to some kind of diseases. Nevertheless, knowledge about health is related to the citizens and they need control their own state of health. The government can help to people with impart information to education about the number of junk food they can eat and effects of this food. It will be more better than increasing the tax and also it will grow burden to middle and lower class of society. Therefore, it can be affected more than half population of country.
On the other hand, fast food consists different kind of harmful to peoples' health ingridients. Sometimes some of ingridients can be the reason of negative illness. Therefore, ingredients should be prohibited by the government and this solution should help to delete the problem.
For instance, most of people who live in a large city do not enough time to eat meal fully. It will be easier to go to the fast food cafe and do not waste time what to choose and wait until their food will be ready.
In conclusion, I am completely disagree that imposing tax it is a good way to resolve this issues. Moreover, it would put economical problems to the poor and middle class of state.
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 20 for test purposes use and refer to the current year 67
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extend do you agree or disagree with 56
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 340, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...at and effects of this food. It will be more better than increasing the tax and also it wil...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ferent kind of harmful to peoples health ingridients. Sometimes some of ingridien...
^^
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...p to delete the problem. For instance, most of people who live in a large city do not enough ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...ready. In conclusion, I am completely disagree that imposing tax it is a good way to r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...lve this issues. Moreover, it would put economical problems to the poor and middle class o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64444444444 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53416707095 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540740740741 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.1655371585 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.6 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382462503564 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116445199101 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758780712782 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193883647711 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064806587918 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 340, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...at and effects of this food. It will be more better than increasing the tax and also it wil...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ferent kind of harmful to peoples health ingridients. Sometimes some of ingridien...
^^
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...p to delete the problem. For instance, most of people who live in a large city do not enough ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...ready. In conclusion, I am completely disagree that imposing tax it is a good way to r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...lve this issues. Moreover, it would put economical problems to the poor and middle class o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64444444444 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53416707095 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540740740741 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.1655371585 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.6 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382462503564 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116445199101 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758780712782 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193883647711 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064806587918 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.