In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food.It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
People have different views about whether the government should raise the tax for fast food or not. I believe that resisting eating fast food by providing a higher tax works.
On the one hand, people need some outside force to dent their appetite for keeping an unhealthy diet. For starters, they would have little self-control when exposing to temptations. With fast food increasingly involving in our daily life, it goes without saying that almost every citizen has tried them despite being aware of the harms. Furthermore, today citizens are more likely to work overtime to earn more money, resulting in less time for them cooking by themselves. More and more people resort to convenience food. So some outside force to help them cut down reliance on this tasty but harmful food, like raising the levy, may make a difference.
On the other hand, it should be the government’s responsibility to resist the excessive eating of junk food. This is because if a growing number of citizens have medical conditions, the burdens of the healthcare services system will soar. Thus the government would have no choice but to budget a multitude of funds towards healthcare. Compounding this is that other fields, such as education and infrastructure construction also need huge investments. In this way, raising the tax would be the most efficient and cost-effective way to reduce the potential cost of eating fast food.
To summarize, I believe that it would be a practical and efficient way to offer a higher tax for fast food to the public. This measure could enormously reduce people’s dependence on fast food.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | Trinh-tuan | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | my220904 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | nobody123456789 | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 84
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities 73
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e healthcare services system will soar. Thus the government would have no choice but...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06367041199 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81176392252 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602996254682 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7941640557 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.1333333333 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29620838995 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10245624662 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598335018914 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201504865779 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468809824945 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.