Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students should spend time on more important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion
he incessant argument that pupils are supposed to get frequent exposure to food science is of great concern. Many reveal reliable and reasonable causes to believe in their views, but after in-depth thinking, I have come to my conclusion. From my perspective, I am strongly of the dissent side that focusing on other subjects at school are less beneficial.
On the one hand, it is apparent that food science play a fundamental role in our daily life. It enables learners to be confident in that area and jumps at their chance. Nowadays, careers relating to this content is highly acclaimed and well-paid, adding a more persuasive cause to experience that major. Thanks to food science, students are well trained in terms of manual work or painstaking related work. By enrolling frequently in food science lessons, learners are at a higher opportunity of silent growth in aesthetic and adroit manual skills. For example, as food science subject usually requires students to do self-practice, such as cooking, decorating dishes or checking several types of food's nutrition, students are supposed to gain genuine experiences, therefore see escalating ability in many skills due to frequent practice.
On the other hand, apart from food science, a wide range of natural science, social science and language subjects pave the way for students to acquire comprehensive skills and preparation. As a matter of fact, school curriculum has been modified and designed cautiously by experts in order to reach the ultimate educational efficiency, repudiating the whole suspect of its ability. Furthermore, the modern world imposes stricter qualities for a global citizen, which means one getting access to several areas may take advantages over others. Moreover, in the case of his indifference to food science, he can earn his stable income thanks to other streams of study rather than food science program.
In conclusion, although food science is undoubtedly significant at school, time management should be kept in order to balance with other subjects, as a person of success must be prepared for manifold real-life cases and challenges from all areas, not only food science.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he incessant argument that pupils are supp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28612716763 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85138860678 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632947976879 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7050833362 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.642857143 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194438495247 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577636485999 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482546907156 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111369798885 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322490124575 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.