The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph displays the middle amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per citizen in four different cities (The UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal) from 1967 to 2007. The numbers of carbon dioxide emissions measure in metric tonnes.

Overall, it clearly seen that in Italy and Portugal states the average figures constantly climb, albeit, in the UK and Sweden was a significant drop.

The UK's carbon dioxide emissions start at just above 10 tonnes in 1967 and the following decade would see a continuously reduce by the year 2007. With regards to Sweden the amounts were roughly 8 tonnes early in the year and after that the trend was peaked at just over 10 in 1977. In the following years, CO2 emissions were a massive slide.

Although, the figures of Italy moves with constantly rise at the beginning aproximately 4 also in 1997 there was a modest growth until 2007. Portugal's increase is very similar. The emissions of almost 2 tonnes in 1967 expands in a unremarkable manner to more than 5 tonnes by the end of the year.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, CO2 emissions were a massive slide. Although, the figures of Italy moves wit...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...CO2 emissions were a massive slide. Although, the figures of Italy moves with consta...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a unremarkable manner" with adverb for "unremarkable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ions of almost 2 tonnes in 1967 expands in a unremarkable manner to more than 5 tonnes by the end of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s of almost 2 tonnes in 1967 expands in a unremarkable manner to more than 5 tonn...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76536312849 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48313810424 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581005586592 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0580425247 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7777777778 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242263868668 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100952886595 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770976260521 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151932406043 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880476166512 0.0819641961636 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.