The bar chart given illustrates data regarding how many percent the boys age and the girls age in Australia did in their spare time in five different fields in the age of 5-14.
As can be inferred from the graph, overall, the percentage of the boys selecting bike riding, electronic or computer games was higher than skateboarding or rollerblading and art & craft, whereas the girls choosing electronic or video games, art & craft, and bike riding was greater than skateboarding or rollerblading. Another striking feature is that the percentage of spending time on watching TV or videos reached a peak at both boys age and girls ages.
Regarding to bike riding, the percentage of boys age spent on these activities was higher than girls age, standing at about 78% and 58%. Besides, a somewhat similar trend was recorded in the ratio of choosing electronic or computer games when the boys were marginally 80%, and the girls were precisely 60%. The proportion of Australian children spending on watching TV or videos is equal, at 100%.
A converse tendency was witnessed in the figures for skateboarding or rollerblading. In contrast, the figure for boys age bracket in skateboarding or rollerblading was nearly 40% compared to more than 20% of the girls age group. The girls age constituted the percentage of spending time on art and craft than boys age, with north of 55% and the boys were nearly 40%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 433, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'boys'' or 'boy's'?
Suggestion: boys'; boy's
...ing TV or videos reached a peak at both boys age and girls ages. Regarding to b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, regarding, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99576271186 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87225673766 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495762711864 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6548290043 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0380702698497 0.215688989381 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237038822021 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264771763546 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.025413316435 0.15604864568 16% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231215425531 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.