The diagrams show how cooking equipment has developed. Overall, this equipment has become more convenient as a few but useful features have been added to it.
In the beginning, the cooking equipment had a simple design, and it was placed on top of a few stones that served as a leg to lift and balance it and made a room for wood to provide fire to cook food. It was much taller then. However, after sometime, it became much smaller flat-shaped equipment totally made of clay, but had bigger space and stones to make a roaring fire.
By contrast, the recent cooking equipment has developed a lot and that it comes with a range of features. It has two parts, one above the other. The lower one contains a chamber made of special metal, and it has a door that allows air enter and push the ash inside, while the upper chamber is built using clay. This version uses only charcoal and so has special grates for it. Moreover, unlike the other two, it has special handles and support systems for putting a pot on them.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Many people believe that countries should produce food for all population eats and import food as little as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities 67
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is to a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47849462366 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29741065846 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.2447232457 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150668456677 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061496411161 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785956953993 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110228594492 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588191849632 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.