"According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the last year. Clearly, the content of these reviews is not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not in the quality of our movies but with public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater quantity of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising."
By allocating a greater share of budget for a super screen movie is not perfect solution for getting more viewers. Many of the reasons are responsible for shortfall of viewers in multi starrer movies which can't be explain by rating of the critics only.Producers should always keenly take care of viewers intrest of watching movie and thier likely genre.
One of the main reason behind the shortfall of audience is also thier dislikement of specific genre that are making them discomfort in viewing the movies. For example in a specific town if the portion of young viewership is so low. So it will be risky to premiere romantic and horror genre while on the same note other town which have greater portion of above 50's audience it will be greatly profitable to premiere the movies genre like comedy and all that stuff. Distrubator should make specific arrangement of this fundamental things while delivering glaze of movies.
Only depending or taking parameters of critic reviews is also none other than foolishness. Nowadays various online streaming platform has been introduced which make audience lazy to come theatre and enjoy the movie. This stated factor should be disccused among the association of cinemas, that are also endangering the bussiness of cinemas exponently.
Various others factors like baseness in storyplay, slowness of movie, bad direction and certain other factor which are making this art boring is also responsible for shortfall in viewership. While other small budget movies with interesting storyplay,
better costume, pragmatic direction and conveying good message to society generates better level of audience.That overall makes better revenue on box office.
Thus only making concentration on increasing budget for marketing is not responsible for retaining the audience movie producer should take care of above stated ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-25 | rubelmonir | 16 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | rubelmonir | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | Mizanur_Rahman | 50 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | tedyang777 | 60 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | barath002 | 58 | view |
- All cities should devote at least five percent of their budgets to programs that preserve and protect existing parks
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 58
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 50
- Some peopre beft eve lhey should keep oll the money they hove eorned ond should nol poy lox lo lhe sfofe Do you ogree or disogree 21
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 58
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 11 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 295 350
No. of Characters: 1542 1500
No. of Different Words: 169 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.144 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.227 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.585 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 126 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 87 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 57 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.583 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.096 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.353 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.652 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.077 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...f viewers in multi starrer movies which cant be explain by rating of the critics onl...
^^^^
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Producers
...e explain by rating of the critics only.Producers should always keenly take care of viewe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'movies'' or 'movie's'?
Suggestion: movies'; movie's
...l be greatly profitable to premiere the movies genre like comedy and all that stuff. D...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Only depending or taking parameters of critic reviews is also none other than f...
^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ccused among the association of cinemas, that are also endangering the bussiness ...
^^
Line 8, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: That
...iety generates better level of audience.That overall makes better revenue on box off...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...akes better revenue on box office. Thus only making concentration on increasing...
^^^^
Line 11, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... should take care of above stated ones.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 28.8173652695 35% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 2260.96107784 70% => OK
No of words: 293.0 441.139720559 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38566552901 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71230367476 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 204.123752495 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576791808874 0.468620217663 123% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 705.55239521 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.051076018 57.8364921388 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 119.503703932 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 23.324526521 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.70786347227 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145670581672 0.218282227539 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536286162532 0.0743258471296 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450669165688 0.0701772020484 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.072526425675 0.128457276422 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491457589053 0.0628817314937 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.3799401198 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.3550499002 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.5979740519 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.32208582834 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 98.500998004 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.