Some people say that should all subject taught to student in school . Other say that only one subject taught in which children learnt interesting . Discuss both views and relevant examples ?
People throughout the world suggest students should only learn the subject which they are interested in. However, focusing on one subject can be detrimental, and diverse learning should be far more beneficial. This essay will discuss both sides using examples from Hong Kong and Oxford University to demonstrate the points and prove arguments.
A fundamental reason is that there is a biological age for learning various subjects in school. The central reason behind is twofold, firstly, in case of learning limited area of subjects under 10, it results in slow learning efficacy. For instance in Hong Kong, schools provide at least 10 subjects for students to learn, since it is crucial period for exploring massive knowledge no matter they are interested in those subjects or not. Secondly, being reluctant to learn is a part of training, by giving opportunities to tackle the problem, the student's self-confidence is built up and well prepared for the challenge of the future. Consistent with this line of consideration, students are recommended to not only learn the subject which they have intention to learn and also equip themselves with other subjects.
Furthermore, the potential of students cannot be fulfilled by learning one subject only. An intensive research by Oxford University illustrates that 90% of student who are under 16 are capable to manage learning more than 5 subjects. Although they are not interested in all the areas, it is suggested that adolescents should spend more time on learn massive subjects in their school life. It is conclusively clear that the positive impacts of diverse learning outweigh that of negative impacts.
To conclude, despite students have sufficient intention to learn interested subjects, it is worth to learn different knowledge in order to have a better self-development.
- Agencies throughout the world tend to recruit their staff with various nationalities Some schools of thought argue that there are many constructive impacts to having more foreigners in companies while I totally agree that enterprises are recommended to em 78
- The chart illustrates the consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 11
- The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008
- Nowadays most large companies operate multi nationally To what extent those companies should have responsibility towards local communities in which they operate 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'intensive research'.
Suggestion: Intensive research
...fulfilled by learning one subject only. An intensive research by Oxford University illustrates that 9...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 461, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to outweigh'
Suggestion: to outweigh
...he positive impacts of diverse learning outweigh that of negative impacts. To conclu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, at least, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35172413793 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94811251816 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.37670065 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.384615385 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215514745882 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928206869464 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681176955148 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141498779875 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701983760318 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.