Today our lifestyle is changing rapidly and affects the family relationship. Do advantages outweigh the disadvantages
While some people opine that the relationships are affected due to changes in the living pattern, others believe that the present way of living increases our bonds. I agree with the latter notion and I believe that merits are more than demerits.
To commence with, there are multifarious advantages of this approach and at the top of that is it improves the communication between family members. To be precise, technology has made life a bed of roses as people can easily talk with their parents, even if they live far away. For example, there are ample of applications that are used by users as to convey their messages, such as Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram. Likewise, with the assist of these social platforms, a person can easily connect with their parents. Moreover, modern transportation methods play a crucial role in relationships. To epitome, transport means not only making travel effortless but also increases the bond between the families as an individual can meet their family easily by using these ways.
Despite having numerous advantages there are some drawbacks of this approach. Firstly, mankind adopts a modern lifestyle, as a consequence, they spend less time with their family members because they prefer to spend more time on their work. Not only this, but it also creates a generation gap as modern juveniles spend their maximum time on gadgets instead of sitting with their grandparents. Hence, they do not know the moral values as they do not like to spend their time with their elders.
To conclude that, although there are few disadvantages, merits outweigh all negative aspects of this approach. There are many good results if used appropriately.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-08 | Manvir singh | 78 | view |
- The charts below show household spending pattern in two countries between 1980 and 2008 40
- Reducing working hours is an effective solution to reduce employment 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 78
- When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The bar chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, likewise, moreover, so, while, as to, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11231884058 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73576157758 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9804595302 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.785714286 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108305663133 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354749244618 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440853067178 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0652734351299 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315447218974 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.