widespread knowledge or a particular subject
By and large, it is beyond doubt that education is an integral part of people's lives. In this regard, to cope with this contemporary period with the essential amount of information is important. There has been no shortage of debates among scholars about the limitation of knowledge whether it should be about one particular subject or about multiple fields. As for this writer's opinion, I subscribe to the idea of having widespread education in a variety of subjects. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroborating my idea is by getting an insight of different subjects, a person can find his talents and pursue their currier in the interested field. It is notable that many people have difficulty in assessing their tasks and doing jobs due to the lack of interest in it. The problem is overcome when students learn about multiple subjects at the same time in school. By doing so, they have a better understanding of their hidden abilities. For a successful future and stress-free life, the use of talent is of paramount significance. To people, a job does not seem to be hectic or a job-like if they do it with interest. Vividly, the mentioned point can only be achieved by studying a wide variety of subjects rather than a single one. By way of illustration, when I was in high school, I studied a variety of subjects including maths and biology to get an insight and better understanding of my interest. Before taking courses, I thought maths fascinates me more but after taking widespread knowledge, I got inclined towards science and biology. Now, I am a successful doctor. HAd I taken a single course in school, I would not be a doctor today.
The second exquisite reason makes me hold my belief that studying a single subject hinders a person's ability to take an active part in a conversation among people belonging to multiple areas of study. It is crystal clear that a person with a specific knowledge has difficulty in conversation and gets along with other people in a gathering because he will find his area of an expert to talk to. Otherwise, he will get bore and his ability to interact will diminish. Since there is a competition to excel well in life among people, it is very essential to have a broad knowledge of every subject to survive in this world. As a case in mind, last week I attended a seminar in which I met different people. I was able to communicate well with them due to the vast knowledge I had about different subjects. this clears my pint
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer although specific subjects guide students to focus on a particular field of life, widespread knowledge is better in terms of competing with modern society. For the sake of brevity, a couple of reasons are worth reiterating: firstly, knowledge about a variety of subjects helps in finding your interest, secondly, it enhances the ability of communication among multiple fields of experts. As a writer, I vehemently urge students to take a broad sense of every aspect of life . By doing so, you can excel more in race of life.
- Air purifiers 80
- Colonization in asteroids as compare to other planets 3
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth century Dutch painters However there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him One such painting is known as Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet The pa 81
- benefits of going green 90
- do you agree or disagree It is better to work as a team or as an individual 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...t or about multiple fields. As for this writers opinion, I subscribe to the idea of hav...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1114, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'took'?
Suggestion: took
...y. Now, I am a successful doctor. HAd I taken a single course in school, I would not ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...hat studying a single subject hinders a persons ability to take an active part in a con...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'specific knowledge'.
Suggestion: specific knowledge
... It is crystal clear that a person with a specific knowledge has difficulty in conversation and gets...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 804, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...owledge I had about different subjects. this clears my pint By perusing the above...
^^^^
Line 7, column 522, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ke a broad sense of every aspect of life . By doing so, you can excel more in race...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, as for, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 99.0 52.1666666667 190% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2597.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 545.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76513761468 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82534729104 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504587155963 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 833.4 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9711320287 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8846153846 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9615384615 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.80769230769 5.45110844103 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226801953603 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497520794764 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705686430555 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151515593132 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616040660661 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.