Modern technology has increased our material wealth, but not our happiness. To what extent do
you agree with this statement?
In modern context, technology has played an important factor in amplifying net worth of the people. Many people hold the opinion that the technology is helping to gain the material possessions, others believe that it is hampering our life. In my opinion, the abundant use of technology is the reason for the decrease in happiness of the people.
On the one hand, technology has made our life easier by supporting business to grow. Firstly, the availability of instant messaging applications is helping business to communicate till the ground level. For example, in value chain, one farmer growing business for a manufacturing company can communicate directly to the manufacturer through applications like WhatsApp to share the status of the fruits. Secondly, transportation is much easier, and people can send their products through different courier service provider's like DHL and FedEx.
On the other hand, the excessive use of computers and mobile phones has imbalanced our body. In the first place, people are spending most of their time sitting in the chair looking at the computer. This is the main reason people are having health issues related to backbone, neck, and neurological abnormalities. Furthermore, the entire posture of the people is changing due to excessive use of mobile phones. If we go outside in a public area to check, it is clearly visible people leaning downward using the mobile phones.
In conclusion, wealth can be increased by using technology, however, I think it should be balanced and more focus needs to be given for the health of the people which will bring happiness for everyone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-27 | aileean | 11 | view |
| 2021-02-25 | enassar | 61 | view |
| 2021-02-17 | pawanbhattarai05 | 95 | view |
| 2021-02-17 | pawanbhattarai05 | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-21 | kjot_59 | 61 | view |
- Modern technology has increased our material wealth but not our happiness To what extent do you agree with this statement 95
- Some people say that protecting the environment is the government s responsibility Others believe that every individual should be responsible for it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 85
- Modern technology has increased our material wealth but not our happiness To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16349809886 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87231089435 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585551330798 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2548498393 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.166666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.25 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134404473474 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488021313305 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503030440356 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807676020498 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546643596959 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.