The first graph shows the weight in tonnes of fruit produced by the farm each month in 2013 and also almost in tonnes of fertilizer used. The second graph shows the volume of rainfall in each month
The graphs depict information about the tonnage of fruit produced on a farm per month in 2013, the fertiliser used and monthly rainfall that year.
Overall, the emerging fact from the charts is that food production had an active relation with rainfall received, whereas it has a weaker relation with the amount of fertilizer used.
As per the graph, in the first three months, the figure for rainfall was higher, however, February had experienced a higher proportion of rainfall, at 16mm. Then, a gradual declined was accounted till July. In terms of production, in the first four months, the figure stood at 2.5 tonnes, which was comparatively lower than the next five months. By contrast, between May and September, there was a hike in harvest, from 2.5 to 4.5 tonnes. Likewise, in the next three months, the rainfall becomes heavy again and the output of fruits dropped suddenly by the end of the year.
Marching forward, fertilizer just hiked two times a year that was, March and November, which accounted for 0.8 and 0.7 respectively. However, the lowest use of fertilizers in July, at only 0.1 tonnes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-21 | Manvir singh | 84 | view |
- The chart shows the consumption of sales of coffee in five different cities 73
- The below charts show the spending on both countries between 1980 and 2008 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 78
- The charts below show household spending pattern in two countries between 1980 and 2008 40
- The charts below show the household expenditure in the two countries between 1980 and 2008 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of fertilizer used. As per the graph, in the first three months, the figure fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, likewise, may, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94117647059 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61367705153 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0350648008 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166441023567 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683687544678 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981745978387 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122764407425 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123233882422 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.