If
BY and large, it is established beyond doubt that with the dawn of human civilization, the environment is nurturing human beings. In this regard, meticulous usage of resources is of paramount importance. There are different schools of thought among people. Where some reckon that future research needs to be focus on improving the marine environment, or some even beings imaginative to surf the space.On the other hand, others contemplate initiating the development after accurate weather prediction. As for this writer's opinion, I would subscribe to the latter idea. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first reason corroborating my stance is associated with the notion that disbursing funds for accurate weather prediction will result in a plethora of advantages. To be more specific, the weather forecast will accelerate agricultural development. For instance, farmers are able to grow a variety of crops and harvest the crops at the rights time. Not only it will enhance the net production of crops, but it can also aid people to avoid certain unexpected situations. It is notable that in its contemporary life, it is arduous for people to take out their time for a vacation. If they take out time and their plan ruined because of an unexpected rainstorm, it resulted in depression and anger in them. By knowing weather accurately people can plan their vacation. Moreover, the World can avoid many dangerous circumstances, if only they are alerted of imminent danger. By the way of illustration, people can plan better to avoid hurricanes, storms, and tornados.
The second compelling rationale behind my opinion is rooted in the fact that initiating research for cleaning oceans or exploring space is a wastage of resources and eventually impractical. It is axiomatic that we should solve the current problems first before foreseeing the future. Consuming funds for space exploration would be not just a wastage of time and money but such kind of research need patience and high technological equipment. It is also worth mentioning that marine life is part of our natural ecosystem, preventing them is as necessary as balancing the natural environment. The government can regulate policies through which people are educated to create less pollution in the oceans and seas. Furthermore, revenue obtained from agricultural development can be utilized to start educating people about saving marine life. It is crystal clear to see how much research in weather prediction would be profitable.
By perusing the above paragraph, one can infer that through solving others' issues might be important but the urgent need is to solve imminent problems. For the sake of brevity, few points are worth reiterating. First, stimulating research projects for weather forecasts will have a myriad of advantages. Second, spending on other researches is not a dire situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | nha1806 | view | |
| 2024-11-06 | Huỳnh Hưng | 100 | view |
| 2024-10-31 | Fifi13 | 76 | view |
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-19 | Barry Shi | 66 | view |
- Question Knowledge is an important part of our life Some people prefer having deep knowledge about one particular subject while others prefer having widespread knowledge about a variety of subjects Which do you prefer and why Use specific reasons and exam 73
- If one of your friend is visiting your country and he has just one day which place would you suggest him to go 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People are never satisfied with what they have they always want something more or something different Use specific reasons to support your answer 60
- What changes you would expect in 21st century 70
- What do you think is a better way of communication to convey your message text message or direct call 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 402, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...en beings imaginative to surf the space.On the other hand, others contemplate init...
^^
Line 1, column 514, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ccurate weather prediction. As for this writers opinion, I would subscribe to the latte...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, as for, for instance, kind of, by and large, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2458.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28602150538 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96876715968 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563440860215 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 774.9 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9475379819 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5384615385 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8846153846 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.03846153846 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 402, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...en beings imaginative to surf the space.On the other hand, others contemplate init...
^^
Line 1, column 514, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ccurate weather prediction. As for this writers opinion, I would subscribe to the latte...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, as for, for instance, kind of, by and large, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2458.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28602150538 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96876715968 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563440860215 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 774.9 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9475379819 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5384615385 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8846153846 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.03846153846 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.