Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to work as a team than as an individual to succeed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is very important to be succesfull in our modern society. So, it spawns a reasonable question, namely whether it is better to work alone or to work in a team to achieve better results. In my opinion, the team work is a better way. Here I will try to explain why.
First, I think that working in a team improves a productivity of work. A single person can only do things which he is personnaly skilled in. Thus, it may be very hard for him to accomplish complicated tasks that require a lot of different skills. However, a team can effectively distribute roles, and every person will be doing some part of a task matching with his skills. In history, there are a lot of examples when people successfully used this approach. For example, the famous Henry Ford car revolution was driven by exactly this thing. A team of factory workers was able to produce an extremely high number of cars mainly because every worker was used for only a small part of a car, but he brilliantly knew his part and was trained to do it very fast.
Secondly, I think that teams are better because, generally, more people means more brains. It may be very hard to come up with a great idea working alone. One person may simply think in a wrong direction and do nothing. But a team sharply increases a probability that a task will be correctly resolved. For example, a lot of companies use so-called "brain storm". When some non-trivial task should be solved, a lot of workers gather in one room and try to solve it cooperating with each other. Moreover, all ideas, even those which seem stupid, are highly appreciated, This is because an idea can only seem stupid, being very useful in fact. An idea can also be improved by other member of a team. It proves that team work is really better for generating ideas.
As a concluson, I think that team work is preferrable relative to working alone. I think so because team work increases productivity and can be effectively used for generating breakthrough ideas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-11 | arius | 90 | view |
| 2021-07-11 | arius | 76 | view |
| 2021-04-19 | Mithun Chandra Banik | 85 | view |
| 2021-03-03 | DmitryGrigorev | 60 | view |
| 2020-12-08 | Pravin s. jadhav | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to work as a team than as an individual to succeed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Easter Island 77
- pers 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world Use reasons and details to support your opinion 76
- Avocados 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, i think, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61904761905 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69174703908 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509803921569 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0517227578 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.9545454545 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2272727273 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20229259347 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684554504742 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532152889192 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143918421213 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203379689884 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.