The table below gives information on consume spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table depicts information about the people in five different countries, how much spent their money on three distinct categories in the year 2002.
Overall, the emerging fact from the table is that the largest proportion of money spent by consumers on food in each nation, whereas expenditures on food and education were lower.
Looking at the information in more details, the Turkish spent their huge amount of money on food, drinks and tobacco, at 32.14% and Irish were the second-largest spenders, at nearly 29%. By contrast the outlay on food and drinks in other countries, the figure was less than one fifth. In terms of clothing and footwear, Italians spent their currency around 9% which was 3 percent more than other countries and the figure for Sweden only 5%.
Marching forward, Spanish spent nearly 2 percent of their income on leisure and education, which was relatively lower than other nations. Although the outgoing's were much lower when it comes to leisure and education, turkey again account the largest figuree, with 4.35%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | .zin@ | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minthu vũ | view | |
| 2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- Some people believe that the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people while others say that technology has the opposite effect Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Nowadays the media is paying a lot of attention to the life stories of famous people in fields such as cinema sports and modeling What are the reasons for this Do u think it is a positive or negative trend 73
- Today our lifestyle is changing rapidly and affects the family relationship Do advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The chart below shows the household spending pattern in two countries between 1980 and 2008 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12209302326 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50642090529 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598837209302 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9423604981 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109563780635 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518323245521 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809644220491 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843604053958 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943077406677 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.