Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantage of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, there are a number of museums adapting levying fee policy for entrance while others give people the freedom of paying a visit. This trend does bring about some drawbacks; nevertheless, this essay would argue that these are outstripped by their merits.
On the one hand, it seems unreasonable to charge for admission because of several reasons. One of them is that the tickets price is believed to cost an arm and a leg. In the other words, it is likely to much more exorbitant in comparison with low- income households. For instance, in Quang Nam, which is one of provinces in central of Vietnam, a numerous number of low-salary laborers complained that the price they had to pay for each time going to museums was extremely high; therefore, they tend to choosing to other entertainments rather than going to museums or gallery. Besides, meseums such as The Museum of Science, The National History Museums and so on are believed ti be a pucblic property, so citizens have leagally rights to visitng them without paying any money. If they did not paying for admission, it would attract lots of individuals to get there; as a result, they could have opportunities to neither witness invaluably historical as well as historic remains or understanding about national history. This leads to broaden their horizons.
Nevertheless, despite the aforementioned disadvantages, I believe a number of benefits are blaimed for passing this rule. As mentioned above, the cost that people have pay to enter museums can help managers to be able to curtail potential risks affecting to precious treasures. This is examplified by the burlary of Mona Lisa's portrait used to happen in Paris, France a couple of decades ago because of lacking the rules of charging people for admission to museums; as a result, pricing entry ticket seems to minimize dangers to all of objective related to historical, scientific and national stored in museums. Furthermore, admission charging rules are attributed to raising a flexible fund to cover the expensive fees for repairing surveillance and alarming systems annually as well as monthly salary for accomplished security- guards. If there were no this budgets, those expenditures would accidentally press burden on the national treasury. To illustrate, in Vietnam, thanks to the capital raised from the entry fees, the governments stand opportunities to channel national budget into others significant domains such as industry, education, tourism and so on. This plays a vital role in the economic advancement.
In conclusion, while pricing policy is disadvantageous to a certain extent, its benefits outweigh by far any of its supposed
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-09 | Phương Nga | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 89
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantage of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The charts below show the average percentage in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much in the USA 78
- Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 200, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...a leg. In the other words, it is likely to much more exorbitant in comparison with...
^^
Line 2, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y high; therefore, they tend to choosing to other entertainments rather than goin...
^^
Line 2, column 794, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'pay'
Suggestion: pay
...thout paying any money. If they did not paying for admission, it would attract lots of...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ned disadvantages, I believe a number of benefits are blaimed for passing this ru...
^^
Line 3, column 853, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...plished security- guards. If there were no this budgets, those expenditures would ...
^^
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fits outweigh by far any of its supposed
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2239.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 430.0 315.596192385 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20697674419 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96451065406 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586046511628 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.2349823316 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.705882353 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2941176471 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279012262117 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748726827667 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750404018057 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151041867554 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480775735071 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 200, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...a leg. In the other words, it is likely to much more exorbitant in comparison with...
^^
Line 2, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y high; therefore, they tend to choosing to other entertainments rather than goin...
^^
Line 2, column 794, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'pay'
Suggestion: pay
...thout paying any money. If they did not paying for admission, it would attract lots of...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ned disadvantages, I believe a number of benefits are blaimed for passing this ru...
^^
Line 3, column 853, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...plished security- guards. If there were no this budgets, those expenditures would ...
^^
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fits outweigh by far any of its supposed
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2239.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 430.0 315.596192385 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20697674419 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96451065406 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586046511628 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.2349823316 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.705882353 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2941176471 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279012262117 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748726827667 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750404018057 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151041867554 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480775735071 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.