the charts below show the average precentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make a comparisons where relevant.
write at least 150 words.
The pie charts illustrate the comparison of three types of nutrients towards four typical meals which are allowed to be unhealthy if eaten too much in USA. Overall, it is immediately apparent that the highest precentage is Dinner for two nutrients except Added Sugar. Subsequently, Breakfast is the lowest proportion on all of nutrients.
The amount of Dinner giving the greatest proportion on twice Sodium and Saturated Fat with not far of the precentages at 43% and 37% rather than in added sugar only 23% on the middle proportion. Afterwards, Snacks giving the different proportion in three nutrients, in added sugar, obviously Snacks is the greatest proportion of 42%, nevertheless in Saturated Fat only 21% which is the middle precentage and much different from Sodium that is the lowest proportion of Snacks at 14%.
Meanwhile, both Breakfast and Lunch which consumed by people in USA are seeing different proportion. In contrast, lunch often stayed in the middle precentages on all of nutrients. In Saturated Fat at 26% similar data to Sodium at 29% and too much far from Added Sugar which has seen by 19%. Furthermore, all of nutrients giving the simiar data of Breakfast at 16% both Saturated Fat and Added Sugar, then, 14% on Sodium which the lowest proportion by people consume.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 11 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-10 | Mayuresh0809 | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05607476636 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80846952837 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481308411215 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.116040769 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.222222222 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173578076112 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889512524952 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107914749838 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155111562536 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116484129288 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.