The figure demonstrates how many women were employed over the course of 20 years starting in 1995. Information is shown in 4 countries, namely the USA, Korea, Afghanistan and France.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that all the countries experience an upward trend in the percentage of employed women with the exception of Afghanistan whose data is considerably unsteady.
It can be seen in the graph that the percentage of working women in the USA went up steadily between the year of 1985 and 2000, until it was followed by a slight decrease by 2005. The percentage of working women in Korea shows a steady increase as well, but with no decrease. The data on the rate of women employed in Afghanistan shows a different trend. There were about 33 percent of women working in 1985 and the rate rose moderately until 1995. However, for some reason, the rate dropped dramatically from 1995 10 2000 to 10 percent and it continued to drop by 2005. In the case of France, there was a sudden decrease of around 10 percent from 1985 to 1990, which was followed by a swift growth of approximately 20 percent between 1990 and 1995. The rate of women employed in France then stabilized until 2005
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: hhtmh1999
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 135, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...end in the percentage of employed women with the exception of Afghanistan whose data is considerably ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69811320755 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67490679828 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537735849057 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0272261568 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320543645703 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125098239533 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597552791232 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186033331081 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712540671763 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.