The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figure for 2015

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figure for 2015

The given table demonstrates the proportion of the vicinity covered by forest in four different countries in a period of 15 years from 1990 to 2005 as well as predicted figures for 2015. Generally speaking, the percentage of forested land in four countries experienced two major trends: downward trend and upward trend, and these trends are expected to continue in the future.
The figures for two countries represented a rocket in the quantity of land covered by forest, consisting of New Zealand, at 28.8% in 1990, climbing to 31% in 2005, with a predicted rise to 32.2% in 2015. By the same token, the rate of forested vicinity in Chile also increased from 20.4% in 1990 to 21.5% in 2005, also is believed to rise to 22% in 2015
In contrast, in a 15-year-period, percentage of land covered by forest in Australia and Brazil both experienced a downward trend. As seen from the table, Autralis’s 1990 figure of 21.9% fell to 21.3% in 2005 and estimated to continue to decline to 20% in 2015. While Brazil’s forested land experienced a plunge from 62.2% in 1990 to 57.2% in 2005, and this figure is predicted to drop further to 53.5% in 2015.

Votes
Average: 9.1 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-03-16 imduongg 91 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while, in contrast, as well as, by the same token

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72139303483 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76445954543 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502487562189 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.8523093229 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.166666667 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 5.23603664747 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402399795808 0.215688989381 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214862236816 0.103423049105 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759054302096 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286015527847 0.15604864568 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00899831623346 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.36 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.