The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in million tones from four different sectors between 1990 to 2007
The line graph illustrates four different sectors that caused acid rain emissions in the UK over a 17-year period, from 1990 to 2007.
Overall, it is evident that the acid rain emissions that came from domestic were by far the lowest over the time shown. The enormous change was seen in the electricity, gas, and water supply.
In 1990, the highest level was seen in electricity, gas and water supply, which was at approximately 3.3 million tonnes. It was followed by other industries and transport and communication, which were at around 2.1 and 0.7 million tonnes respectively. The amount of domestic just over 0.5 million tones, the lowest point of four sectors.
Over the following 17 years, there was a dramatic decrease in the quantity of electricity, gas and water supply and hit the lowest point at 0.5 million tones by 2007, a drop to nearly 3.5 million tones. At the same time, other industries and domestic were went down and bottomed out at 1.2 and 0.2 million tones respectively. In contrast to this, there was a slight decrease in the amount of transport and communication, which reached a peak at 1 million in 2005 then declined to nearly 0.75 million tones in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-19 | ngockhanh18112007 | 73 | view |
- The line chart below shows the percentage of Internet users in 3 countries from 1999 to 2009 71
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions measured in million tones from four different sectors between 1990 to 2007 73
- the line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 515, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to nearly 0.75 million tones in 2004.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81862745098 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68718229259 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9277124592 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.222222222 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258362987709 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116855947443 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128416007975 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198918575221 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152258806077 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.