The bar graphs demonstrate how much proportion of employers giving response to the students of different age groups.
Overall, it can be manifested that, the highest proportion of student who are under 26 are studying for their career while, student over 49 age they are doing for their interest. Whereas, the students are under 26 has the highest proportion of supported by employers.
Firstly, the highest proportions of students who are studying for their career are almost 80
%. While, there are 10% of same age students studying for their interest. Moreover, the age groups of 26 to 29 and 30 to 39 have 70% and 55% respectively. Also, 15% and 25% of students studying for their interest. The students who are between 40 to 49 age have similar proportion (40%) studying for career and interest. However, the lowest figures of over 49 age students (below 20%) studying for their career and 70% for their own interest.
Secondly, the maximum proportion of under 26 age students are supported by employers (above 60%). The figures of 26 to 29 age group and 30 to 39 age group students who have support of employer are 50% and 30% approximately. In addition, the ratio of 40 to 49 age group students has slightly higher as compared to 30 to 39 age group students. Finally, the students over 49 age has 40% proportion of employer support.
- The table below gives information about population in Australia and Malaysia in 198o and 2002 Summarise information and make comparison which relevant 56
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- These days many people leave their country to work abroad and take their family with them Do you think benefits of this outweigh disadvantages in terms of family development
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 179, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... age they are doing for their interest. Whereas, the students are under 26 has the high...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... age group students has slightly higher as compared to 30 to 39 age group students...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80519480519 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70171643596 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.406926406926 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8419901933 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3846153846 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7692307692 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318938771307 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154789546596 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383129390458 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191072926011 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534875313101 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.