Nowadays governments are investing more in public transport such as buses and trains rather than in building new roads. What are the reasons for this? Is this a positive or negative development?
Recently, governments are directing funding in communual transportation rather than contributing the infrastructure. This is the hotly-debated topic that often divides opinion. While some people think it is beneficial for society, others believe that it is unappropriate.
Firstly, there are several justification that government state funds being directed in public transport. Environment may be the primary reason for this change. Because of the function of public transports, this change can reduce carbon footprints and exhaust fumes which harm to citizen’s health as well as avoid the impaction of climate to people. At the consequence, this is able to reduce the respiratory disease, which is common damaging to physical well-being. Besides, this can help their habitants save expenditure for moving, which citzens are cut off tax of their own transports. In that way, governments are directly support financial for their citizens. Moreover, moving by public transports can solve the traffic jam issues in many developing countries.
The development of public transports may draw out many positive aspect. Public transport can be higher discipline as passenger are forced to follow the rules. Futhermore, it can help citizens save their money as well as be more independent and sociable. Especially, this may help student be more mature and willing to deal with their prolems. On the other hands, public transport may have some drawbacks which can annoy people’s life. Moving by public transport not only waste of time but also be depended on the schedule of that transport. In some cases, public transport is detrimental because of the crimes;therefore, people always have to be careful. In general, the crowded atmostphere in a small space like public transport make people feel irritated.
Although public transports still have some negative aspects, it still be invested widely and popularly because of its useful function. In addition to, public transport plays a prominent role in social life;hence, it will be disastrous if public transport disappear some day.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-30 | Annie18122005 | 67 | view |
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 40
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Figures show that some countries have an increasing proportion of the population who are aged 60 or older What do you think the effects of this may be 78
- Figures show that some countries have an increasing proportion of the population who are aged 60 or older What do you think the effects of this may be 56
- Nowadays governments are investing more in public transport such as buses and trains rather than in building new roads What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thers believe that it is unappropriate Firstly there are several justification ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun justification seems to be countable; consider using: 'several justifications'.
Suggestion: several justifications
...priate Firstly there are several justification that government state funds being direc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...am issues in many developing countries The development of public transports may...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c transport make people feel irritated Although public transports still have so...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...ill have some negative aspects it still be invested widely and popularly because o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, in addition, in general, as well as, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.365625 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84653709575 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55625 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 320.0 20.2975951904 1577% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1717.0 106.682146367 1609% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 320.0 20.7667163134 1541% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 166.0 7.06120827912 2351% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275276147208 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.275276147208 0.084324248473 326% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173584608317 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322605225131 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 163.9 13.0946893788 1252% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -261.78 50.2224549098 -521% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 129.3 11.3001002004 1144% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.35 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 24.1 8.58950901804 281% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 60.0 9.78957915832 613% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 130.0 10.1190380762 1285% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 130.0 10.7795591182 1206% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.