The given line graph presents the percentage of full workers holding a university degree, and the table gives information about the average salary of both these types of graduates (the graph and table only compared to between Math graduates and All graduates) in Australia, from 2004 to 2012.
According to the graph, it is clear that the proportion of Maths graduates peak at 90% in 2006 and after that, the proportion shrinks consistently to 80% in 2012. Meanwhile, the proportion of All graduates ascended continually to approximately 85% in two periods of 2004-2006 (rapidly increasing to approximately 85%) and 2006-2008 (growth was slow and peaked at approximately 85%) and the proportion dipped notably, falling by almost 10% in 2010 and continued to drop to almost 65% in 2012.
In the table of the average of graduates, it is apparent that the average salary of both types A and B have been increasing steadily for 8 years from 2004 to 2012. For Maths graduates, average salary grew significantly in the period from 2006 to 2008, when it rose to 7,000 dollars. Similar to All graduates, while increasing strongly in 2010-2012 with an increase of 4,000 dollars, less than the biggest increase of Maths graduates of 3,000 dollars in 2006-2008.
- The maps show changes in a city in 1950 and now 73
- Information about Travelling to Work in Houston Texas and CO2 Emissions from Different Forms of Transport 61
- Information about Travelling to Work in Houston Texas and CO2 Emissions from Different Forms of Transport 61
- The Table and the Bar chart below give information about travelling to work in Houston Texas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Information about Travelling to Work in Houston Texas and CO2 Emissions from Different Forms of Transport 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 473, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d continued to drop to almost 65 in 2012 In the table of the average of graduates...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hs graduates of 3000 dollars in 20062008
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85576923077 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82823098996 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495192307692 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 208.0 22.4926829268 925% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1010.0 112.824112599 895% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 208.0 22.9334400587 907% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34781439278 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.34781439278 0.103423049105 336% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252849217379 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122266173695 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 105.5 13.2329268293 797% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -122.72 61.2550243902 -200% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 82.0 10.3012195122 796% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.39 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.69 8.06136585366 207% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 11.4329268293 499% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 85.2 10.9970731707 775% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 57.0 11.0658536585 515% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.