The first graph shows the percentage of travelers in Houston, Texas perform transport and the average age of the travelers in relation to the kinds of vehicles they use to work. In addition, the next graph illustrates the quantities of CO2 emissions from those kinds of transports.
The biggest amount of CO2 is caused by a car with a driver only. There are almost 0,35 kilograms per person for every one kilometer. Unfortunately, this way is chosen by almost 50 percent of workers in Houston. In contrast, zero CO2 emission is preferred by only four percent of travelers. Other kinds of transportation are cars with 4 people (used by 11 people and cause CO2 emission almost 0,1 kilogram per kilometer) and train or bus (used by 37 percent workers and produce not until 0,025 kilogram CO2 per kilometer).
Generally, the youngest workers choose to travel to work by walking or cycling (average age is 39). The 43 years old men or women prefer to drive the car to their office or workplace. Car with more than one passenger is preferred by the average 44 years old workers. Furthermore, the oldest workers (average 47 years old) choose to travel by train or bus.
In short, it can be concluded that public transports like trains, buses, or public cars are still less favorable than other kinds of transports.
- The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS General Test in 2010 56
- Information about Travelling to Work in Houston Texas and CO2 Emissions from Different Forms of Transport 61
- The Table and the Bar chart below give information about travelling to work in Houston Texas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Information about Travelling to Work in Houston Texas and CO2 Emissions from Different Forms of Transport 61
- The Table and the Bar chart below give information about travelling to work in Houston Texas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... relation to the kinds of vehicles they use to work In addition the next graph illu...
^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilogram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilograms'.
Suggestion: kilograms
...people and cause CO2 emission almost 01 kilogram per kilometer and train or bus used by ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, so, still, in addition, in contrast, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68584070796 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55256048711 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526548672566 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 226.0 22.4926829268 1005% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1059.0 112.824112599 939% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 226.0 22.9334400587 985% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 65.0 5.23603664747 1241% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234812858175 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.234812858175 0.103423049105 227% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146168942475 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10853564002 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 113.7 13.2329268293 859% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -140.99 61.2550243902 -230% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 89.1 10.3012195122 865% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.4 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.71 8.06136585366 220% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 11.4329268293 481% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 92.4 10.9970731707 840% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 55.0 11.0658536585 497% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... relation to the kinds of vehicles they use to work In addition the next graph illu...
^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilogram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilograms'.
Suggestion: kilograms
...people and cause CO2 emission almost 01 kilogram per kilometer and train or bus used by ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, so, still, in addition, in contrast, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68584070796 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55256048711 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526548672566 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 226.0 22.4926829268 1005% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1059.0 112.824112599 939% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 226.0 22.9334400587 985% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 65.0 5.23603664747 1241% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234812858175 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.234812858175 0.103423049105 227% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146168942475 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10853564002 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 113.7 13.2329268293 859% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -140.99 61.2550243902 -230% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 89.1 10.3012195122 865% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.4 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.71 8.06136585366 220% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 11.4329268293 481% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 92.4 10.9970731707 840% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 55.0 11.0658536585 497% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.