The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in to of the years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following charts depict the rates of marriages and divorces amongst American people between 1970 and 2000, with showing the percentage of marital status of adults in America in two different years of 1970 and 2000.
As can be clearly observed from the first chart, the same number of marriages took place in both 1970 and 1980, around 2.5 million, while divorces experienced a significant increase at the same time, from a million in 1970 to nearly 1.5 million in 1980. From 1990 onward, either marriages or divorces declined slightly. The former was around 2.3 million in 1990 and reached two million in 2000, while the latter from a bit less than a million touched one million during 1990 till 2000.
Turning to the second chart, the percentage of American adults who married was the highest in 1970 as well as 2000, with 70% and less than 60, respectively. Followed by never married people that consisted of 15% in 1970 and 20% in 2000. Meanwhile, widowed maintained the level of approximately 10% in both 1970 and 2000. Finally, American adults who decided to divorce included near zero percent in 1970, and it went up dramatically to 10% in 2000.
Overall, it is clear from the charts that, whereas marriages decreased remarkably during 1970 till 2000, the number of divorces climbed considerably between 1970 and 1980, then it declined to one million in 2000, as the same number of 1970.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-06 | sattar_iust | 56 | view |
- Experience is the best teacher Some people believe it is more effective than formal school study and books what do you think 88
- Improvements in health education and trade are essential for development of poorer nations However the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas To what extent do you agree or disagree with 89
- Scientists believe that the increasing average temperature is an issue What caused global warming and present solution to reduce its effect 88
- Some students choose university near where they live and continue to stay at home with families other students choose university away from family what is the advantages and disadvantages for both sides 88
- Nowadays people believe that the environment influences their accomplishments Some people think their success and accomplishment were influenced by the places where they grew up Do you think the environment does or does not affect people s accomplishment 94
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, then, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72384937238 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49274081323 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468619246862 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 239.0 22.4926829268 1063% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1129.0 112.824112599 1001% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 239.0 22.9334400587 1042% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 66.0 5.23603664747 1260% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236860854192 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.236860854192 0.103423049105 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187969684783 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941466796187 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 120.3 13.2329268293 909% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -145.73 61.2550243902 -238% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 93.0 10.3012195122 903% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.58 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 18.33 8.06136585366 227% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 11.4329268293 481% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 97.6 10.9970731707 888% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 93.0 11.0658536585 840% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.